Curious What Type of Hair Transplant Is the Best?

Hair loss is no joke. It sneaks up on you, strand by strand, leaving your confidence feeling a little thin too.

But you don’t have to settle for a receding hairline!

Enter the world of hair transplants — a game-changing solution that’s as advanced as it is effective. From natural-looking results to minimally invasive techniques, today’s options are a far cry from the hair plugs of the past. So, what’s the best type of hair transplant? Let’s dive in and unravel the secrets to a fuller, thicker crown.

What is the Best Type of Hair Transplant?

After evaluating the pros, cons, costs, expected results, and patient satisfaction rates of each hair transplant procedure, the No-Shave FUE stands out as the most advantageous option. 

You get natural results without the need for shaving your head, making it an ideal choice for men who want discretion and minimal downtime. 

Although it comes with a higher price tag, you can keep your current hairstyle and you are far less likely to have any scarring, making it a worthwhile investment for men who want the best results. If you want an effective hair restoration solution, the No-Shave FUE procedure is our top recommendation.

The Types of Hair Transplants

Early balding, male pattern baldness and hair loss are common concerns for many men. But nowadays there are many ways to restore your hair, and your confidence. 

As you explore various hair restoration solutions you’ll discover the most popular methods are:

1) the Follicular Unit Transplant (FUT),

2) the Follicular Unit Excision (FUE), and

3) the innovative RESTORE® No-Shave FUE™

A Drastic Improvement

From Hair Transplants of the Past

No Plugs, No Staples, No Linear Scars, No Shaving. A superior approach to Hair Transplants. 

Best Type of Hair Transplant Procedure: FUT, FUE or No-Shave FUE?

1990 - Strip Method (FUT)

Best Type of Hair Transplant Procedure: FUT, FUE or No-Shave FUE?

2003 - F.U.E.

Best Type of Hair Transplant Procedure: FUT, FUE or No-Shave FUE?

2022 - F.U.E.

Each of these procedures has distinct advantages, disadvantages, and suitability depending on individual needs and preferences. We’ll review the specifics of each method, examining their pros, cons, costs, expected results, and patient satisfaction to help you make an informed decision.

FUE Hair Transplant vs No-Shave F.U.E.

What are the differences?

Aspect

FUE Hair Transplant

No-Shave F.U.E.

Shaving Requirements

Shaving Requirements

Shaving Requirements

Procedure Duration

Generally quicker

May take longer

Healing Visibility

More noticeable post-surgery signs

Minimal post-surgery signs

Social Downtime

Some downtime due to visible healing

No downtime due to visible shaving

Graft Yield

High number of grafts (3200-3600)

Fewer grafts (3200-3600)

Cost

Generally lower cost

Slightly higher cost

Harvest Method

Follicular Unit Excision

Follicular Unit Excision

Result

Natural-looking hair restoration

Natural-looking hair restoration

Versatility

Suitable for various degrees of hair loss

Suitable for various degrees of hair loss

The RESTORE® No-Shave FUE™ Hair Transplant

The RESTORE® No-Shave FUE™ is a specialized variant of the FUE technique that does not require shaving the donor or recipient area. This method allows patients to maintain their existing hairstyle during and after the procedure. It’s the ultimate solution for busy professionals who require minimal downtime and the most discreet and natural results.  

Pros & Cons of a RESTORE® No-Shave FUE™ Hair Transplant

Thinking about a hair transplant... but dreading the thought of shaving your head? No-Shave FUE might be your perfect match. This innovative technique offers all the benefits of a Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) procedure—without the buzzcut. But, like any cosmetic solution, it comes with its pros and cons. Before you make your decision, let’s break down what makes No-Shave FUE a standout choice—and where it might fall short.

Pros
  • No Shaving Required: Preserves the patient's current hairstyle, making the procedure discreet.
  • Minimally Invasive: Shares the minimal scarring and quick recovery benefits of traditional FUE.
  • Natural Appearance: Ensures a seamless look during the recovery period, with no visible signs of surgery.
Cons
  • Higher Cost: Due to the complexity and time required, No-Shave FUE is often more expensive than standard FUE.
  • Limited Availability: Not all clinics offer this specialized technique, requiring patients to seek out qualified surgeons. RESTORE®’s Medical Director Dr. James Harris is a pioneer in No-Shave FUE and has brought the prestigious procedure to all of the RESTORE Locations
  • Time-Intensive: The procedure can be even more time-consuming than traditional FUE due to the careful extraction and placement process. RESTORE helps busy professionals complete multiple procedures to make recovery as quick as possible. 
Conclusion

No-Shave FUE is the ideal choice for those who want to restore their hair discreetly without the hassle of shaving their head. It offers natural-looking results with minimal downtime, making it perfect for busy professionals or anyone looking to keep their procedure under wraps. With advanced techniques and no visible scarring, it’s a seamless way to regain your confidence and get back to your routine quickly. For a private, effective, and life-changing hair restoration experience, No-Shave FUE is hard to beat.

Why Choose No-Shave FUE?

No-Shave FUE is perfect for individuals who want a discreet procedure without altering their hairstyle. It is ideal for professionals or public figures who cannot afford the downtime associated with visible signs of surgery.

FUE procedure Icon

Price Point

The cost of No-Shave FUE ranges from $8,000 to $25,000, reflecting the expertise required from the doctor and clinic, as well as the personalized nature of the procedure.

Non invasive Approach

Expected Results

Patients can expect natural-looking results with no visible signs of surgery, maintaining their pre-surgery appearance throughout the process.

Comfortable

Patient Satisfaction

No-Shave FUE boasts high satisfaction rates due to its discreet nature and excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Before & After

Real Clients, Real Results

Lasting results are the most significant indicator of a successful procedure. From celebrities and athletes to businessmen and every man, RESTORE's hair transplant before and after stories are a testament to our expertise and results.

100% authentic RESTORE clients. No photoshopping. No trick photography. No Stock photos.

100% authentic RESTORE® clients.

No photoshopping. No trick photography.

Brian Urlacher

Hall of Fame Football Player
RESTORE® Client

Deion Sanders

Hall of Fame Football Player
RESTORE® Client

Kevin Streelman

PGA Golfer
RESTORE® Client

Zach Johnson

PGA Golfer
RESTORE® Client

Ryne Sandberg

Hall of Fame Baseball Player
RESTORE® Client

Jamie S

Management
RESTORE® Client

Drew J.

Information Technology
RESTORE® Client

Josh K.

Management
RESTORE® Client

Not all patients will experience the outcomes shown in the photographs and described in the testimonial statements on this website, and not all persons will be eligible for the procedure.  Results will depend on a number of factors, including your personal medical history. Please ask a physician about your individual case. Testimonials were compensated for their endorsements. 

The Follicular Unit Excision (FUE) Hair Transplant

Follicular Unit Excision (FUE) is a far more modern technique that involves extracting individual follicular units directly from the donor area using a specialized punch device. These units are then transplanted to the recipient area helping men achieve a very natural looking result due to the precision of the procedure.

Pros & Cons of an FUE Hair Transplant

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) has revolutionized hair restoration. It's known for its natural results and minimally invasive technique. But no procedure is perfect. FUE comes with its own set of advantages and challenges. Let’s break down the pros and cons to help you decide if it’s the right choice for your hair restoration journey.

Pros
  • No Linear Scar: Because FUE uses advanced methods to harvest the follicles there is very little, if any, scarring, which is great for men with short hairstyles.
  • Faster Recovery: Recovery time is generally quicker and less uncomfortable compared to FUT because of the advanced technique.
  • Flexible Donor Area: Hair can be extracted from various parts of the body, not just the scalp.
  • Natural-Looking Results: Because of the precision with which the follicles are moved, the results are very natural. 
Cons
  • Time-Consuming: FUE is a more time-intensive procedure, which may require multiple sessions for extensive hair loss.
  • Higher Cost: The meticulous nature of FUE usually results in a higher cost per graft compared to FUT due to the higher quality of the procedure.
  • Limited Graft Yield: FUE may not be able to harvest as many grafts in a single session as FUT. Men may choose to have multiple sessions as this also helps ensure the most natural results. 
  • Must Shave Before Procedure: patients must shave their head prior to their hair transplant procedure to allow for the grafts to be relocated.
Conclusion

The FUE procedure is an excellent option if you’re comfortable shaving your head for the process. It’s highly effective, delivers natural results, and has minimal scarring. By shaving, the surgeon gains better access to donor hair, ensuring precision and efficiency. This approach also makes the healing process faster and easier to manage. If discretion during the procedure isn’t a priority and you’re focused on achieving great results, FUE is a fantastic choice.

Does RESTORE Offer FUE Hair Transplants?

Yes, RESTORE believes that the FUE Hair Transplant is a good choice for men who are comfortable shaving their head prior to the procedure.

Why Choose an FUE Hair Transplant?

FUE is ideal for individuals who prefer a minimally invasive procedure and want to avoid a linear scar. It is suitable for those with mild to moderate hair loss who are willing to invest in a longer, more meticulous process for natural results.

What is the Harris Safe FUE?

Back in 2002 Dr. James Harris published the Harris Safe system. It was a revolutionary new technique that allowed for individual hair follicles to be moved from the back of the head where most men are plentiful to the balding areas either at the temples or at the crown.

As soon as patients began experiencing the success of the Harris Safe FUE method, more and more surgeons began offering this type of procedure. RESTORE has been at the forefront of advancements in hair restoration for more than two decades, which is why so many men choose RESTORE. 

The Follicular Unit Transplant (FUT) Hair Transplant

FUT, also known as the strip method, is one of the oldest hair transplant techniques. It involves removing a strip of scalp from the donor area, typically the back of the head, and removing  individual follicular units for transplantation.

Pros & Cons of an FUT Hair Transplant

Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT) is a tried-and-true method for hair restoration. It’s known for delivering impressive results, especially for those needing a larger number of grafts. However, like any procedure, it has its advantages and drawbacks. In this section, we’ll explore the pros and cons of FUT to help you decide if it’s the right fit for your hair restoration needs.

Pros
  • High Graft Yield: FUT can harvest a large number of grafts in a single session, potentially making it suitable for extensive hair loss.
  • Cost-Effective: Generally, FUT tends to be more affordable than FUE due to the efficiency of the procedure. An FUT procedure takes far less time because more grafts are harvested at a time.
  • Scalp Coverage: May be ideal for patients needing significant scalp coverage.
Cons
  • Linear Scar: The removal of a scalp strip results in a linear scar, which can be noticeable with short hairstyles.
  • Longer Recovery: FUT typically has a longer recovery period due to the more invasive nature of the procedure.
  • Potential for More Discomfort: Post-operative discomfort may be higher compared to FUE.
  • More Noticeable: Because of the linear scar the results are typically more noticeable and do not appear as natural as new methods.
  • Outdated: FUT was the preferred method for hair transplantation for many years until newer technologies allowed for individual follicles to be transported from one area of the head to another. 
Conclusion

While FUT has been a reliable hair restoration method for years, it’s no longer the top choice for many due to advancements in technology. The procedure requires a strip of scalp to be removed, which can leave a linear scar and a longer recovery time. Newer techniques like FUE and No-Shave FUE offer equally natural results without the need for invasive surgery or visible scarring. For those seeking a less invasive, discreet, and modern solution, FUT has largely been overshadowed by these innovative options.

Get a Quote

& Save $1,000 on Your FUE Procedure.

Get a Quote

& Save $1,000 on Your FUE Procedure.

Exact cost depends on your level of hair loss. Tell us about your hair loss to get a quick quote. A full head of hair pays off for a lifetime.

 
$1,000 off full price. Cannot be combined with any other discounts or offers.

$1,000 off full price. Cannot be combined with any other discounts or offers.  

Get a quick quote. It's easy.

Give us a minute, we'll give you the world.

Which picture most closely resembles your hair loss?

Quick Footer Embed

Section